‘the Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the Usa!’ Do You Agree?

1000 words 4 pages
The separation of powers is a theory of government whereby political power is distributed among three branches of government; the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The doctrine of the separation of powers embodies three basic principles; limited government, which means that the government’s power over its citizens is limited by the Bill of Rights. Secondly is the separation of personnel, meaning that no one person can hold office in separate branches of the government at the same time. And lastly, each branch of government keeps a watch over the other branches of government and in some cases can overrule it to prevent them from becoming too powerful.
Neustadt (1960) wrote that rather it being a government with ‘separated
…show more content…
The power of the purse encourages effective government as it limits the power of the president in that he cannot simply spend money on policies without the permission of Congress. However it can be argued that Congress need not to interfere with the Presidents spending plans, as he does not just come up with ideas on his own, he works closely with specialist teams that help him to decide how to distribute money and what to spend the money on, and they aren’t decisions that are taken lightly.
Congress also have the power of investigation. This means that they can investigate the actions or policies of any member of the executive branch, including the president. For example, President George W. Bush’s handling of national security issues both before and after the events of 11/09/01 was investigated by Congress. This helps to uphold an effective government as it means that the actions of everyone are closely monitored to make sure that as little as possible is done wrong, and that what is done wrong, can be put right by whatever means are necessary. While this kind of scrutiny is key to the success of the government running smoothly, people may argue that the Congress should concentrate on more important issues and jobs rather than constantly checking what everyone is doing in case of very minor faults.
These checks and balances are very important for the running of the government. They encourage close cooperation between the two major parties and compromise between the

Related

  • How Far Do You Agree with the View That in the 1920’s the Kkk Possessed Neither Sizable Support nor Significant Influence?
    2052 words | 9 pages
  • In the short stories in ‘The Bloody Chamber’, Carter is excessively interested in violent instincts’. How far do you agree with this view?
    953 words | 4 pages
  • Do You Agree with the View That Mary Seacole , and Not Florence Nightingale , Was the Real ‘Angle of Mercy’ During the Crimean War?
    1174 words | 5 pages
  • ‘Twelve Angry Men Shows That One Man Can Make a Difference.’ Do You Agree?
    1846 words | 8 pages
  • Commercial hospitality is just extension of hospitality in the home. Do you agree?
    1933 words | 8 pages
  • How Far Do You Agree That Hitler’s Regime Was a ‘Consensus Dictatorship’?
    1476 words | 6 pages
  • “the Incompetence of Existing Government Contributed Greatly to the Outbreak of Revolutions” to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement? Argue Your Case with Reference to the Russian Revolution (Oct 1917) and Chinese Revolution (1949).
    1873 words | 8 pages
  • Do You Agree with the View That by 1940 the Main Obstacle to Indian Independence Was Not British Imperialism but Divisions Within India?
    992 words | 4 pages
  • Do You Agree with the View That in the Years 1515-1525 Henry Viii Wholly Surrendered Power in Government to Cardinal Wolsey?
    909 words | 4 pages
  • How Far Do You Agree That Garibaldi Played a More
    1262 words | 6 pages