GENERAL PURPOSE: To persuade the audience that pit bulls are nice loving dogs.
SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To persuade the audience that pit bulls are not naturally dangerous.
CENTRAL IDEA: Pit bulls are just like any other dog. It depends on how a pit bull or any other breed of dog is nurtured to determine the characteristics of the dog.
Pit bulls are very loving and obedient
I. Do you have a dog? Does anyone have a pit bull? Well I happy to say that I am a proud owner of 2 blue pits. Their names are Diamond and Jack, and I never been more in love with dog. They are just like my babies. At the end of the summer Diamond had her first litter. I was in awe’s because I was like I’m a grandmother …show more content…
Do you think pit bull can save someone life?
”Pit bulls get a bad rap sometimes,” Sorrells said. “But it’s all in how you train them and raise them. He’s a very loving dog,” in the article Pet Pit Bull Drags Women to Safety.
I identify my rival’s claim, but I disagree with the idea that pit bulls can’t be caring or loving toward people. c. You can see again how my rival made another error of portraying pit bulls base up on only one side of the factor.
[It’s important to remember those pit bulls are no different than any other dogs.]
III. Conclusion I. I have addressed the myth about pit bulls and how loving and affectionate they are. II. To determine the characteristics of the dog it depends on how a pit bull or any other breed of dog is nurtured. Honestly there isn’t a difference between a pit bull and any other dog. III. The responsibility of positive or negative actions are in the training not the breed. IV. Blaming the breed is