Analysis of Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil

1443 words 6 pages
Roxx Alvarado
Professor Aaron Wilson
PHI2010
8 September 2011
Analysis to Anselm’s Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil The debate of the existence of God had been active since before the first philosopher has pondered the question. Anselm’s Ontological Argument was introduced during the 11th century and had stood deductively valid until the 18th century. Then there are the arguments to aim disprove God, such as the Argument from Evil. The Ontological argument is an a priori deductive argument. That is, an argument relating to being, that is independent of prior knowledge of the subject and with a conclusion you must accept IF one accepts the preceding premises. St. Anselm of Canterbury presents the Ontological
…show more content…
In Aselm’s Argument, Anselm premise rely on that being conceived and existing in reality is something that describes God. This rationality does not follow because to exist or conceive does not describe the subject, it only tells us whether it exist or not. Much like how fictional characters do not exist, describing cartoon for example would tell us details of what this cartoon looks like, what its habits are and common antics it goes through, but not whether it exists or not. The question of existence must fall in a separate argument that does not define the character. As there are Arguments to prove God, there are debatable arguments to disprove the God.
The First version of “The Argument from Evil” goes as follow: 1. If God were to exist, then that being would be all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good. 2. If an all-PKG existed, then there would be no evil. 3. There is evil. [Conclusion] Hence, there is no God (Sober, 109)
The first premise is the definition of what God would be if he were to exist. That is a being that has the power to do anything, had knowledge of everything throughout the span of time and is in all ways good. The second premise is created with the first premise in mind. To expand on the second premise it states, if God were all-powerful he could stop any form of evil from happening, if he is all knowing then he

Related

  • Descartes Dream Argument - Philosophy
    1403 words | 6 pages
  • Argument Mapping
    1170 words | 5 pages
  • Omelas Literary Argument
    1159 words | 5 pages
  • Collaboration and Argument
    2208 words | 9 pages
  • Classic Principal of Argument
    878 words | 4 pages
  • Descartes' Evil Demon Argument
    1974 words | 8 pages
  • Proposal Argument Essay
    1836 words | 8 pages
  • The Argument Culture Summary and Response
    927 words | 4 pages
  • Classical Principles or Argument
    1177 words | 5 pages
  • Argument
    1505 words | 7 pages